Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Nothing for money- Beware The Financial Guru

Marianna and Willem Van Gogh at their home in south east Calgary. The Van Goghs
say they were defrauded by Gerard Darmon (Photo: Andrew Querner)
they sold their dairy herd and milk quota for $1.4 million and reinvested the proceeds in a couple of Dexior’s projects. For the next two years they received interest payments of $15,000 a month, and encouraged other farmers they knew to invest too. They are now broke.


Nothing for money



By Michael McCullough | July 14, 2011

"If you’re an employee, you’re a slave,” Robin J. Elliott tells the roughly 30 people assembled in a meeting room in a three-star hotel in suburban Coquitlam, B.C. The speaker, a bald, bespectacled man wearing a tailored suit and expensive watch, takes a similarly dim view of conventional entrepreneurship. “People buy a business, and it becomes a job,” he says in his clipped South African accent. “It becomes a prison.”

I’ve paid $39.95 (the event notice says “regular price $497,” but everyone seems to get the discount) to attend a full-day seminar from DollarMakers, an outfit run by Elliott and his wife, Rika, out of their Coquitlam home. If you follow their program, they say on their website, you can retire in less than a year. And if you own a business, they can help you double your profits in 97 days. The secret to earning income without risk or working for it, I learn on this day, is bringing together a buyer and a seller of services and receiving an ongoing commission on all the business they do together. They call this arrangement a “joint venture.”

For my money, I expected the speakers to at least be entertaining, sort of like the SlapChop guy. But instead I get trite aphorisms (“If you want to make the gold, you have to think golden”) and unsupported generalizations passed off as business wisdom with the help of a few props (a hunting knife, a gerbil’s exercise wheel) and the occasional bit of audience participation. The lecture is filled with pop-psychological jargon, referring to “hot buttons” and “triangulation of trust.” The only distractions during break times are the tables lining the walls where DollarMakers Network members hand out brochures for their businesses—jewelry importers, barter schemes, custom baking and the like. I find myself struggling to stay awake, trying not to think of the better ways I could be spending this springlike Saturday in February.

The other participants are more attentive, perhaps because most of them have paid $99 (regular $247) to become members of the DollarMakers Network, a club with weekly meetings and coaching conference calls, and invested in other workshops like this. One tells me she has used the DollarMakers method, bringing together a buyer and a seller she knew, and received a cheque in the mail for a couple of hundred dollars. So there are satisfied customers out there.

But most DollarMakers likely don’t know about the one big blot on the Elliotts’ record. One of their past “joint ventures” was with Steven Friedland, whom the B.C. Securities Commission last fall banned from dealing in securities for 20 years. Friedland headed Western Liquid Funding Inc., which became insolvent in 2010 after raising $12 million from 140 investors over six years without ever filing an offering memorandum. Some of those investors attended the Elliotts’ seminars. According to documents the company filed with the commission as a result of an investigation, the Elliotts’ company, Elliott Enterprises—along with Patrick Giesbrecht, another of the presenters on this day—referred hundreds of thousands of dollars of investment to Western Liquid Funding in return for $262.25 plus a 0.25% trailer fee per month for as long as the money stayed invested.

On her blog site, before Western Liquid became illiquid, Rika Elliott once posted: “We also have had great success investing with Steve Friedland and have referred many other investors to him. We earn good money from these joint ventures. If you are interested in any of these, e-mail me or give me a call. Introducing people to us is an easy way to make money.”

The Elliotts and Giesbrecht have not been implicated in any illegal dealing—in an interview, Robin Elliott insisted this was the only time they’d ever referred members to an investment and “obviously we’re never going to do it again”—but their brand of get-rich-quick seminar has become a fertile recruitment site for investors in a growing number of shady investment schemes. Following the 2008–09 stock market crash, many people are looking at their shrunken nest egg, swearing off mutual funds and looking for other ways to catch up. To many, wealth enhancement experts appear to offer the answer.

While the major stock exchanges, securities regulators and police have made significant progress in the past dozen years purging the old-style boiler rooms and pump-and-dump schemes from the public markets, the marketing of suspect securities continues to thrive in the private domain. Typically, a company advertises or otherwise promotes a particular venture to investors, usually at a fixed price and for a fixed term. At the end of the term, the asset (usually real estate) is meant to be sold, and investors get their money. Sometimes, it begins producing an income stream for the investors. At least, that’s how it works in theory.

One way promoters market these so-called exempt securities to investors is through partnerships with financial self-help gurus who put on seminars in hotel conference rooms. The gurus promise to impart secrets to quick riches, then offer investment opportunities to their trainees. Though some of these investment schemes appear legitimate, a number have ended badly for investors, enough that the B.C. Securities Commission in May issued an investor alert about wealth enhancement seminars. “The BCSC strongly urges consumers to avoid these types of seminars,” the release said, noting that they often offer “questionable ways to succeed in business and/or to make money through things like precious metals, consumer debt, environmental projects, and international mutual funds.”

Investment promoters have long exploited this synergy with wealth experts. Indeed, sometimes the two are one and the same. In 2003, the Ontario Securities Commission disciplined personal-finance guru Brian Costello for flogging investments throughout the 1990s without being registered as an adviser. Some of those investments were even offered by a company that was 47.5% owned by Costello.

A closer look at some of today’s self-proclaimed financial gurus reveals numerous, often surprising, linkages. Toronto wealth adviser Jeff Eshun lured dozens of attendees of his DSC Lifestyle Services seminars to invest in ventures that later became insolvent. His partner in some was Maisie Smith of Langley, B.C. Smith often follows her name with the initials “CBM,” which stands for certified business mentor. The designation is bestowed by none other than Robin J. Elliott, following the completion of a five-day course at an advertised cost of US$19,000, plus $247 a year for membership in the DollarMakers Joint Venture club. In the past year, Smith also became co-director of eConventus Holdings (B.C.) Ltd., the latest venture of one Mohammed (Mo) Jiwani, who has left a trail of hapless investors across the country over more than a decade.

In the fall of 2000, the Ontario-based Jiwani staged a financial self-help seminar called Oracle 20/20 in Edmonton, where Brenda Rost and her husband, Stewart Dean, were in the audience.

Rost describes herself and Dean only as “employees” working in Fort McMurray, Alta., when they first got interested in real estate investment. “We did the RRSP thing,” she explains, meaning investing in the usual stocks, bonds and mutual funds for retirement. But they were still working for a living. They dreamed of a day when their money would do the working for them. They had seen Rich Dad, Poor Dad author Robert Kiyosaki on TV talking about using real estate investments to build wealth. It sounded like a plan. And when they attended Jiwani’s seminar, he was saying exactly what they wanted to hear—that they didn’t have to spend the rest of their lives working for someone else. They enrolled in a course on real estate investing lasting for several weeks. Then they enrolled in a second course on asset protection. It was at that point Jiwani introduced them to a venture he claimed was backed by an offshore bank and became repayable in one year.

“There were red flags everywhere,” reflects Rost, 48, who now lives in the Calgary area. First, the secrecy—Jiwani urged investors not to talk to anyone about it, she says. It was an exclusive opportunity for seminar attendees, available for a limited time, he explained. Second, the company was Canadian but the funds had to be wire-transferred to a shell in Nevada, meaning their US$25,000 investment went “right to Vegas,” Rost says with gallows humour. Third, there was little documentation: no offering memorandum, no financial statements. Rost and Dean had to pester Jiwani just to obtain a share certificate that she says looked like it had been made up on a home printer.

The only way to get any information about their investment was through an Ontario toll-free number. Then, in August 2001, it was disconnected. Rost and Dean received an e-mail saying something had happened, and Jiwani & Co. were doing their best to recover their money. Together with other investors scattered across Canada, they tried to track Jiwani down, but he could not be found.

Others attracted to Jiwani’s seminars tell still sadder stories. Northern Alberta dairy farmers Marianna and Willem Van Gogh attended some of the same Oracle 20/20 seminars as Rost and Dean in 2000. They ended up taking several courses from Jiwani over three years. At one such forum in Vancouver, Jiwani introduced the Van Goghs to Gerard Darmon, who was soliciting investment for a company called Dexior Financial Inc., which was developing vacation properties in B.C.

The Van Goghs did not bite right away, but they continued to attend Jiwani’s events and stayed in touch with Darmon, who presented himself as an accountant and at one point prepared their taxes. Darmon took them on tours of some of Dexior’s building sites, and they were impressed. On his advice in 2006, they sold their dairy herd and milk quota for $1.4 million and reinvested the proceeds in a couple of Dexior’s projects. For the next two years they received interest payments of $15,000 a month, and encouraged other farmers they knew to invest too.

Then in late 2007, Dexior went bankrupt. Though it had invested $12 million in a number of businesses and real estate projects, several were themselves now defunct, and the bankruptcy trustee could not account for another $8 million out of the $20 million Dexior had raised. Once creditors and legal fees are paid, there will likely be nothing left for investors.

“We’re broke,” says Marianna Van Gogh, who continues to serve on the bankrupt firm’s board of trustees. The couple is living in a rented house after lenders foreclosed on a property they’d borrowed heavily to buy just before the 2008–09 financial crisis. Willem, 62, is on a disability pension. Marianna, 58, is trying to set up a new company.

Thanks to the anonymity and limited oversight of the private market, the purveyors of securities snake oil manage to keep peddling their wares to new individuals seeking a shortcut to financial success. Incredibly, in 2007, the same year Dexior collapsed, Rost found Jiwani back in Edmonton. Six years after disappearing during the offshore bank debacle, he was putting on a seminar under a new company name, Q Institute of Wealth Enhancement. Rost confronted him, whereupon he denied any responsibility but offered to help the couple recover their money. After a year of trading e-mails, Jiwani said they were on their own.

“There is no truth to any of their stories,” and the investments he offered were properly documented, Jiwani said in an e-mail to Canadian Business. He nonetheless declined a request for an interview for this story.

“Some of these things, when they go bad, are heartbreaking,” says Lang Evans, director of enforcement for the BCSC. “We’ve seen marital breakups. We’ve seen nervous breakdowns. We’ve seen strokes, heart attacks and suicides. Not only do people lose their money, they lose their lives and their families’ lives.”

Securities commissions are usually associated with policing the stock market, but their reach is, by necessity, expanding. “I’ve seen so much more lost in the private market than I have anywhere close to in the public markets,” Evans says. Fraudulent investment schemes come and go in waves, he adds, and in the wake of the 2008 global financial crash, many people seem ready to try alternative paths to financial independence.

“I can’t paint all of the seminars and all of the products with the same brush, but I can say with certainty there have been problems in this area. Some have been terrific scandals,” Evans says. The challenge for regulators has been detecting and prosecuting an infraction before the money disappears. Even after the fact, it’s hard to prove fraud; after all, honest ventures can go belly-up too.

“We’re kind of like the street cleaners after the circus has gone through town,” he says. Under B.C.’s Securities Act, the commission can regulate who sells securities and how. In the case of self-proclaimed wealth experts, anyone who brings attention to an investment and is compensated for resulting referrals can be defined as a dealer who must now be registered. Those criteria spread the net wide. They would implicate, for example, T. Harv Eker, who hosts motivational seminars at airport hotels and convention centres around North America with his North Vancouver–based Peak Potentials Training. As Vancouver Sun investigative reporter David Baines revealed in a series of articles, Eker has invited the likes of Milowe Brost, who is currently in prison awaiting trial over an alleged $400-million Ponzi scheme in Alberta, convicted white-collar criminal Nick Thill, Michael Ruge, who was banned for life from dealing in securities by the BCSC, and Nick Lathigee, head of the failed Freedom Investment Club, to present at his “Millionaire School” events and received commissions for steering investors in their direction. To this day, neither Eker nor Peak Potentials is a registered issuer in any province. (Eker did not respond to requests for an interview for this story.)

But even then, a charge of unlicensed dealing falls far short of fraud, carries light penalties and may not be worth prosecuting. Often the only proactive thing regulators can do is try to educate investors. Evans rings off some simple rules: don’t buy anything you’re pressured to buy or don’t understand; ask the seller for their qualifications and track record, and if they don’t give satisfactory answers, don’t buy; don’t invest more money than you can stand to lose, and never invest it all in one deal; avoid anything with an offshore element to it (“That means your money’s never coming back”); and seek out an unbiased second opinion, say, from your accountant or bank manager.

As securities law across the country acknowledges, the existence of a private investment market is crucial for the funding of all kinds of business ventures. And for investors, private deals offer real income and asset appreciation that, over the past decade at least, has been elusive in the public markets, argues Jim Sand, CEO of Fast Track Capital, a registered exempt-market dealer based in St. Albert, Alta. “Overall, there hasn’t been a lot of money made,” he says of the stock market. In addition, private investors have access to company management on a day-to-day basis to find out how the project is unfolding, something impossible with a publicly traded stock. Finally, private securities are not burdened with the layers of fees—visible and invisible—that eat up investors’ returns from stocks and mutual funds.

In the past few years, Fast Track has marketed 14 real-estate and energy deals worth $200 million to 3,500 investors, most of them attendees of Fast Track to Cash Flow seminars led by Fast Track Group founder Darren Weeks and based on the Rich Dad, Poor Dad philosophy of financial liberation through ownership of income-generating assets. Of those, one housing project has begun returning capital to investors, Sand says. (Most are set up to mature in five to eight years and as yet are well short of their maturity date.)

In the past year, Canadian securities regulators have raised the bar for exempt-market dealers, requiring them to be registered and bonded, issue an offering memorandum with every deal and provide audited financial statements to investors annually, says Sand, who supports this new layer of assurance. It means an investor can check whether a dealer is duly registered and in good standing simply by going to the Canadian Securities Administrators website (securities-administrators.ca) and checking the national registry, though he recommends doing further due diligence too. Just because someone is registered does not mean they’re scrupulous. Indeed, there will always be operators who manage to stay one step ahead of the law.

“If someone’s going to cheat and lie, they’re going to cheat and lie,” Sand warns. Dead giveaways include use of the word “guaranteed” (“There’s no such thing in investing as a guarantee,” he asserts) and unrealistic timelines, like a year or 18 months to payout. And of course, always beware the hustle, where you have to invest today.

The people attending the DollarMakers seminar do not look at all like suckers. They are mostly in their 30s and 40s, of all ethnic backgrounds, and in conversation obviously consider themselves to be on the make. Some have full-time jobs—accountant for a mining company, college instructor, hairdresser, financial planner—while others own businesses ranging from a tea shop to a Chinese restaurant. Virtually all have something going on the side, a distributorship or a hobby flipping houses. They sound as skeptical and rational as anybody you’ll meet. If they have any reservations about the content of the presentation, though, they keep it to themselves.

In his speaking style, Robin Elliott flaunts his judgmental, dismissive side. There’s an underlying theme of contempt for institutions—for government, for university education, for lawyers and reporters (“the biggest bunch of liars”)—as well as for “losers” who lack initiative and expect handouts. By the same logic, people only have themselves to blame if the joint venture formula doesn’t work out for them. “I know people who joined Amway, failed and now hate Amway. You’ll find that anywhere,” Elliott explains. “Only a small percentage of people will make anything work.”

He offers a final salvo: “You only fail when you quit.”

At no point in this seminar, I should point out, am I presented with an investment opportunity, though I’m encouraged to join the DollarMakers Network and to take a seven-day trial of Elliott and Australian Luke Fatooros’s 12-step wealth-for-life mentoring program for just $1 ($47 a month thereafter). In a telephone interview following the event, Elliott characterizes himself and his wife as victims in the Western Liquid affair who lost $400,000 of their own money. “We were investors, and many of the investors promoted Steve’s investment on a commission basis,” he says. “Everybody got paid every month for seven years.”

Asked how many seminar-goers he’d referred to Friedland, described as “a family friend,” Elliott claims ignorance. Lots of people recommended Western Liquid, he says. “My name gets dragged around and my reputation gets hurt because I’m known.”

After her bad experience with Jiwani, Brenda Rost says she went on to have great success applying the principles learned through housing guru Don Campbell’s Real Estate Investment Network, which is solely an educational organization. She now oversees a small portfolio of rental properties that she researched and bought on her own. Her husband still works at a full-time job.

Nonetheless, participants in any kind of wealth-building seminar are advised to remain wary. “You’ve got to ask yourself,” says the BCSC’s Evans, “why does this person want me to be rich? Is it just out of the goodness of their heart? I think not. There’s usually a financial incentive underlying it.”

Markets Shrug Off U.S. Debt Negotiations

Markets Shrug Off U.S. Debt Negotiations
The Chase by BNN.ca Staff:

The markets are stubbornly failing to reflect the lack of progress in U.S. Congressional debt-limit negotiations. Although the major stock indices pulled back more than a half-percent yesterday, the futures market indicates Wall Street will bounce back today. Asian markets gained ground, and Europe – after starting the Tuesday trading session mixed but mostly higher – turned more negative on news that the British economy is, indeed, growing - but at a slower pace.

The loonie broke above the $1.06 level overnight and has traded this morning as high at $1.0612 U.S. – surpassing the three-and-a-half year high touched last Thursday. The Canadian dollar has typically been viewed as being "riskier" than the Japanese yen or the U.S. dollar, but with the United States approaching the deadline to raise its federal debt-limit or risk defaulting on some of its financial obligations, currency traders are increasingly looking at the loonie as a safer place to be invested. The U.S. Dollar Index, which tracks the American currency against six of its main trading partners, has fallen to the lowest level since June 7.

In earnings news, it was a good news bad news situation for Ford. The good news: the automaker's quarterly profit beat Wall Street expectations helped by higher prices and improved sales in North America of smaller cars. The bad news: improving profits make labour negotiations with the United Auto Workers more difficult. We'll be watching the conference call.

Rogers Communications beat expectations. The house of Ted made more money from smartphones – but reported flat profit as its fought hard to keep its lead position in Canada's wireless sector from being assailed by competitors.

Second-quarter profit at Cenovus more than tripled, helped by higher refining margins and strong crude prices. Rising crude prices also helped BP Plc – which has recovered from the $17 billion quarterly loss it posted a year ago, while fighting the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. In the latest quarter, BP earned $5.6 billion. That works out to a profit of about $61 million per day.

Every morning Managing Editor Marty Cej writes a "chase note" to BNN's editorial staff listing the stories and events that will be in the spotlight that day. In his absence, today's note was written by BNN's web editors.

Monday, July 18, 2011

Equedia Market Summary

Ivan Lo Equedia Weekly


We had yet another down week in the markets with the S&P, Dow, and the NASDAQ all taking a slight tumble. Which leads me to ask the question, why are people still investing in those markets?


Even with low P/E ratios, stocks remain volatile and the economic outlook doesn't exactly favour stronger earnings. Retail has been soft, manufacturing has been flat, the business investment production index fell substantially, consumer sentiment is down, and the CPI rising. Stagflation anyone?

Unless you're investing for the long term of 5-10 years, a lot of investments today just don't make sense.


Even as analysts predict improvement in the second half, none of them have given us any reason as to why. Even Bernanke, despite saying things will improve, continues to lower his forecast. Because of this, precious metals continues to rise as more fear and uncertainty brews.


The next wave of the precious metals boom is about to come and its going to be big. The strength supporting this rally is about to be injected with yet another round of steroids. Starting first with US politics.


This week, the credit-rating agencies that helped to create the recent financial crisis are now warning that the U.S. could lose the AAA rating it has had since 1917. Both Moody's and S&P threatened to downgrade US debt unless the US raises their debt ceiling once again - allowing the US to spend more and go further into debt.


There's no stopping this spending. In the last three years, the Obama administration has spent more than all of the past 20 administrations combined.

According to WSJ:


"With the recession as a rationale, Democrats consciously blew up the national balance sheet, lifting federal outlays to 25% in 2009, the highest level since 1945. (Even in 1946, with millions still in the military, spending was only 24.8% of GDP. In 1947 it fell to 14.8%.) Though the recession ended in June 2009, spending in 2010 stayed high at nearly 24%, and this year it is heading back toward 25%.


This is the main reason that federal debt held by the public as a share of GDP has climbed from 40.3% in 2008, to 53.5% in 2009, 62.2% in 2010 and an estimated 72% this year, and is expected to keep rising in the future. These are heights not seen since the Korean War, and many analysts think U.S. debt will soon hit 90% or 100% of GDP."

The substantial increases of federal debt held by the public as a share of GDP is just insane.

I am not blaming Obama. This debt ceiling debate happens in every administration. It happened 7 times in the Bush administration and the Republicans who were opposed to it, voted in favour of it during Bush's reign. The simple fact is, spending will happen.

So while the debt-ceiling and debt debates between the democrats and the republicans will more than likely by resolved before the August 2nd deadline, as it always has in the eleventh hour, the downgrade threats may keep coming.


That means the US dollar will lose more value. That means gold will gain.


But that's not where the spending stops.

Quantitative Easing


Fed chief Ben Bernanke was on Capitol Hill this week for his semi-annual testimony on the economy before congress to face the heat about the economy, the deficit ceiling and possibly more quantitative easing.

All he did was reiterate what we already know: The US economy is not where it needs to be and that he has no idea how to fix it.


More importantly, despite saying there won't be a QE3 in past conferences, he came out and said that if the economy needs help, the Fed will step in.


Wait a sec...isn't that exactly what we all expected anyway? ( see Age of America Over?) Isn't this what he said before QE2?


It's like I said before, QE3 will happen in some form or another. That means more government spending and more reasons why gold will continue to trek higher.


The financial woes in Europe are also contributing to higher gold prices.


After the European markets closed Friday, the European Banking Authority said eight banks failed its stress tests, with a combined capital shortfall of 2.5 billion Euros. A further 16 banks narrowly passed the tests.


The PIIGS nations are on tilt, facing serious debt issues. Ireland, Spain and Italy are all on the verge of being dragged down by the deepening debt crisis. We haven't even come close to a real solution for any of their major problems. All that has been done thus far are merely temporary bandages that will eventually be peeled off to show a wound that hasn't healed.

I don't like talking doom and gloom, but reality is reality. That's why I am loading up on precious metals stocks while I still can. This boom will be big, but we can't be sure how long it will last. The goal is to make as much money as possible during this precious metals rally - which could be 2 or 3 years - to stave off the next 5 years. After the next few years, I expect a very slow and underperforming market with very little opportunity.


Back to Gold


Gold has everything going for it right now. It has momentum on its side and has clearly become an asset class that's being favoured as both a "risk-on" and "risk-off" investment. It surged over $50 for the week, and has gained $108 an ounce in the last nine sessions.

With interest rates where they are globally, you're not going to get any real returns. That's why smart investors, including banks, have flocked to gold. There's a reason why it's up over 500% over the last decade, while the markets have lagged far behind.


Gold is nearing the $1600 threshold - a number which anti-gold investors said will never happen. While profit taking could slow its momentum, the trend remains to the upside.

Don't worry. If you think you missed the boat on the gold and silver run, there's another ship waiting.

Large managed funds, including hedge funds, added to their bullish bets on gold and silver two days before gold hit this week's record.


Traders increased their net long position in Comex gold futures and options by 25% from last week. These managed funds added 45,576 long positions and 1,184 short positions in the period ended Tuesday, just two days before August-delivery gold hit an intraday record $1,594.90 an ounce.


Managed funds also added to bullish bets in silver. Traders in silver added 1,214 long lots and shed 661 short lots. This took their net position up 10% from a week earlier.


I've specifically said over the last few weeks that the time for picking up bargains is coming to a close (see Before It's Too Late ). Since last week, not only has gold and silver soared but the AMEX Gold Miners Index, the GDM, shot high into the 1600s, closing above 1,654. We also saw the GDX , the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF shoot to the upside, nearly hitting $60.


Finally, the GDXJ, the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF, has climbed above its 50 and 200-day moving average. That's a very bullish signal.


The time is coming for the next big rally in stocks, but it won't be in your traditional large caps. The smart investors and the big money are about to unload their holdings in favour of stocks geared toward precious metals. This includes everything from speculative small caps which offer the best risk-reward leverage, to mid-tier and large cap producers.


My current holdings include all of them. They include small and microcap gold and silver explorers, to large cap producers.


Last week, I mentioned that HSBC has unloaded most of its physical gold holdings in favour of gold stocks (see Before It's Too Late). They're not the only ones.


Catherine Raw, who helps manage BlackRock's $4.7 billion Gold & General Fund, said the rise in the gold price has outpaced cost inflation in the industry, meaning that gold miners are likely to see their margins and their profits increase this year:


"I, as an investor, would say that in the end, given that believe the world isn't going to collapse, while there may be a good few months of volatility left, if you're prepared to be patient, then I would see now as a very good buying opportunity," she said.


As I mentioned last week, there are a lot of battered stocks trading near 52-week lows, but that doesn't mean they are all bargains. The key is to look for companies with great projects in mine-friendly jurisdictions, but more importantly, a management team that can get things done.


While there are many great management teams loaded with geologists capable of advancing projects, I said I will be looking specifically for those who are capable of raising money and supporting their own stock.


Too often I see great projects destroyed by teams comprised only of geologists with no market experience. I can't stress enough how important it is to have a management team with both strong market experience and geological know-how.


As a result, I am finalizing my report on a speculative junior gold explorer that has already begun to drill on a property with significant potential. They're in a prime location surrounded by millions of gold ounces, with a strong management team to back it up.


Those involved in this company have raised billions of dollars in the past and have discovered tens of millions of ounces of gold. These guys know what they're doing. More importantly, they know the markets.


The final report should be released sometime this coming week. Be sure to keep your eyes out for our next Special Report Edition.


When the time comes where we start buying our groceries and tv sets with cows and pigs, that's when gold won't matter.


Usage: Feel free to post this article anywhere you'd like. Just be sure to follow the rules set forth in our usage agreement

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Bernanke is on TV And Financial Markets Are Watching!





Wednesday’s tragic financial comedy came the way of Ben Bernanke and his testimony to the US Congress. In this testimony he said three important things; gold is NOT money (what it is, he did not say), QE3 is on the way, and that the Federal Reserve’s QE program has been a “PROFIT CENTER for the Treasury.” The two statements and the QE3 proclamation are all ridiculous; however, the “profit center” comment is the most absurd.

Have you thought through just what kind of relationship there is between the Treasury and the Fed? First, when the Treasury auctions bonds that are purchased by hedge funds, pension funds, or individual citizens, the purchaser uses his own funds to buy them and the Treasury pays him a rate of return for the use of his money. This is the way it is supposed to work; however, things get dicey when the Fed is involved.

When the Fed buys Treasuries it isn’t using cash on hand today from last quarter’s profit. It is conjuring up money out of thin air in order to pay for the bonds. When Bernanke was recently asked about this (not today) he said it wasn’t money printing. When asked where the money came from he smiled and said “from the Fed,” but it wasn’t money printing. When pressed again and asked if the money was on the books the prior day to pay for the multi-billion bond purchase he said no; it was indeed counterfeited for the purchase.

OK, we know that the Fed counterfeits money for these purchases (oh, and by the way, I DO understand that when a government prints money it is not actually counterfeiting but I don’t care – I will continue to use that analogy) but why was today’s statement laughably absurd? It was ridiculous because the Fed does not pay for bond purchases (QE) with its own money, it prints this money at a cost to the American people (read: INFLATION). Moreover, the Treasury pays the Fed the interest rate on the bond then the Fed remits that same interest payment back to the Treasury. And that’s a “profit center?” Are you kidding me? That’s a circle jerk!

How in the hell can that be a “profit center?”

If you’re married and your wife sells you a bond so she can go shopping, and you pay her with the kids Monopoly money, then she gives you some bucks from the money she “saved on sale items” for the cost of borrowing the Monopoly money, and then you “remit” those dollars back to her…was that a f%$!#* “profit center” for her? NO! It is a financial f%^$!#@ circle jerk that most people do not want to even understand.

“Bernanke is on TV? Who is that guy? I like his beard though, whoever he is. Is TMZ on yet?” Sadly, the average slack-jawed voting yokel is like this.

Here come the bears again. If you have NOT watched this whole video, please do so now. If you HAVE watched it, please view it again since it is relevant another time with today’s testimony of The Ben Bernanke.