Friday, 21 Mar 2008
Gates Foundation to Sell Over Half Its Berkshire Hathaway Shares
Posted By:Alex Crippen
Topics:Bill Gates Warren Buffett
Companies:Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Seth Wenig / AP
Bill and Melinda Gates pose with Warren Buffett after their 2006 news conference announcing Buffett's intentions to give the bulk of his fortune to the Gates Foundation.
The primary beneficiary of Warren Buffett's plan to give away almost all of the money that's made him the wealthiest person in the world will sell most of the Berkshire Hathaway shares it's already received from Buffett.
In a filing with the SEC, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust reveals it has adopted a written sales plan to sell 550,000 of the 975,000 Berkshire Hathaway Class B shares it now owns.
At today's closing price of just under $4348, those 550,000 shares are worth almost $2.4 billion and the total holdings are worth over $4.2 billion.
The sales are planned for a three-year period starting April 1 this year. The filing also says the sales plan can be canceled at any time.
Why? "To facilitate the Trust’s compliance with federal excise tax rules limiting excess business holdings by private foundations."
The Gates Foundation, will be getting more shares, however, as Buffett continues his annual gifts. The AP notes that "Buffett is expected to give 451,250 Class B shares to the foundation this summer as part of his overall pledge to donate 10 million shares."
Current Berkshire Class A price:
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
US%3bBRK.A
132900.0 UNCH 0%
NYSE
Quote Chart News Profile[US;BRK.A 132900.0 --- UNCH (0%) ]
cnbc_quoteComponent_init_getData("US;BRK.A","WSODQ_COMPONENT_US%3bBRK.A_ID0EXGAC15839609","WSODQ","true","ID0EXGAC15839609","off","false");
Current Berkshire Class B price:
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
US%3bBRK.B
4440.0 UNCH 0%
NYSE
Quote Chart News Profile[US;BRK.B 4440.0 --- UNCH (0%) ]
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
No April Fool's joke +PDP Shorts Will Have To Cover Huge Soon
All That Glitters
Respect that glitters
Thursday, March 20, 2008
The Contra Guys
TORONTO (GlobeinvestorGOLD) - Gold is searching for something Aretha Franklin sings about, "A little respect". Most articles that mention the record gold price are quick to point out that it really isn't such a big deal because in inflation adjusted terms, the price is still far below the $850 (U.S.) price it hit in 1980. That may be strictly true, but let's put that into context. That record close 28 years ago was the briefest of blips, a culmination of a sharp speculative frenzy set off by the Iranian hostage crisis and consequent oil shock, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and the looming inauguration of cold war hawk, Ronald Reagan.
Just two months before, gold was trading at only $373. Two months after the high, it touched $481.50.
A better comparison would be to see how gold has done since it was deregulated in 1968. At that time it could be had for $35 an ounce. On that basis, the total return over the intervening 40 years has been better than 2,500 per cent, not a bad store of value for a "barbarian relic".
This time around the bull market in the mythic metal has a more solid feel. Sure, there is a heavy element of speculation, but it seems to be more broad based and less frenzied. Taking a position in gold is a lot easier now through vehicles like trust units and ETFs, and transaction costs are lower.
The main threat to those who want to see gold go higher is the potential for stepped up selling by central banks. That's always possible. However we take the conspiracy theories about how gold is being suppressed by shady powers in order to maintain confidence in the global financial system with a large grain of salt. The more logical scenario is that those who were reluctant to sell off their gold are feeling mighty good about their vaults right now and apt to holding on.
Meanwhile, those who dumped their gold, like our own Bank of Canada, which sold off nearly all of its reserves at a fraction of today's price to get rid of an "unproductive asset", are seeing the folly of putting too many eggs in the U.S. dollar basket.
If former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volker was still in the driver’s seat instead of Ben Bernanke, gold speculators might be cringing. His policy jacked up interest rates to 20 per cent inducing a fierce recession, a contraction of the money supply and a massive deleveraging of the financial system, crushing the gold price.
Instead we have Helicopter Ben, who while not facing the same scenario Mr. Volker did, seems to think that the cure for a drunken spree of excess liquidity is a double shot, straight up. Meanwhile, most other major central banks are nervous about the sinking U.S. dollar and firing up their own printing presses. As long as creating money out of thin air is seen as the solution, rather than the cause of the current financial difficulties, it should be a good time to hold the golden cards, not fold them.
Outside of the Contra portfolio we took divergent methods to gain exposure to gold. A few years ago one Contra Guy loaded up on units in Central Fund of Canada (CEF.A-TSX), which holds gold and silver bullion in a roughly 50-50 split. He is maintaining his position in expectation of further profits. The other contrarian is sitting on a bevy of penny plays that include Goldstake Explorations (GXP–TSX), Opawica Resources (OPW-TSX), Patricia Mining (Pat-V) and South American Gold (SAG-TSX), confident that at least one or two will double in the next twelve months. That's how we spell R-E-S-P-E-C-T.
Copyright ©
document.write(new Date().getFullYear());
2008 CTVglobemedia Publishing
But by the time autumn comes, I believe that sanity will return to the markets
The upside down market
Gordon Pape
Monday, March 31, 2008
TORONTO (GlobeinvestorGOLD) - Most investors hate volatility. It makes them nervous. They don’t like to see their stocks soar in value one day and then plunge like a stone the next. All they want is predictable, steady growth, with no hiccups. I call it the “10 per cent with no risk” syndrome.
It’s easy to understand this mindset. The majority of people don’t have a clear grasp of the complexities of the stock market and don’t want to devote the time required to learn about it. There are other more important priorities in life. Instead, they long for the good old days of double-digit GIC returns when all they had to do was hand over their cash to the local bank and collect interest. Of course, they forget that double-digit interest rates were accompanied by double-digit inflation, which cancelled out the buying power of their profits. It’s the stability and the absence of risk that they recall so fondly.
This helps to explain the continued popularity of principal-protected notes (PPNs), which guarantee that you won’t lose your capital no matter what happens to the markets. Most independent financial commentators (including me) hate them because of their high cost, lack of transparency, and hidden risks. But investors don’t seem to care. They continue to pour billions of dollars into these structured products, much to the delight of promoters and advisors who are getting rich from the fees they produce.
In the past, it was easy for PPN critics to point out less expensive and more profitable alternatives. Certain types of stocks were relatively immune to the general volatility that has gripped the markets in recent years. Financials, utilities, telecoms, and real estate issues offered the kind of steady, low-risk growth that the average investor craves. Dividend funds captured that desirable combination in a neat package. By selecting carefully, an investor could have it all: good cash flow, reasonable growth, and limited downside.
But now that option has swirled down the drain like bathwater. The old reliables have become even more volatile than the broad market. The financial world has been turned upside-down, leaving investors more confused and anxious than ever.
Consider what happened in the first quarter of this turbulent year. As of the market close on Friday, the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index was down 12.1 per cent year-to-date. The Utilities Index, which would normally be expected to rise in a falling interest rate environment, was off 8.4 per cent. The telecom sector was down 11.9 per cent. (Do investors really think people are going to stop watching TV or talking on their cell phones?) The real estate sub-index matched that dismal performance, also losing 11.9 per cent year-to-date.
During that same period, the S&P/TSX Composite Index fell 4.3 per cent. That’s not a major decline in the great scheme of things, however there is a widespread perception that the market is in dreadful shape. I attribute that to the fact that the so-called “safe” stocks bear most of the responsibility for dragging down the broad index. Looking for stability? You’ll find it these days in energy stocks (up 1.3 per cent year-to-date) and mining issues (up 5.5 per cent).
So what should the low-risk investor do?
Have we entered a new era, where commodities offer safe havens and utilities are fraught with peril? I don’t think so. I believe that the current situation is an aberration and that six months from now the markets will have regained a semblance of normalcy.
From that, it follows that I advise low-risk investors to stay on plan. Maintain a balanced portfolio, which means a bond/cash position of at least 30 per cent (more for older people). Hold quality blue-chip stocks and don’t abandon your dividend funds.
I know it’s tough to stick with them when the average dividend fund shows a six-month loss of 5.7 per cent (to Feb. 29) but remember that you’re investing for the mid to long term. Despite the recent losses, over the past five years the average dividend fund has generated an annual gain of 12.5 per cent. That’s a handsome return for what was once, and will be again, a low-risk place for your money.
I expect we will have to ride out at least one more tough quarter before conditions start to return to normal. But by the time autumn comes, I believe that sanity will return to the markets and we will be able to move on with our lives. Stick it out until then.
Copyright © 2002 Bell Globemedia
