Tuesday, December 3, 2013

If history is an indication, the stock market could extend its rally into December

Since the 1900s, December is the best month for the Dow, and second-best month for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq. Historically, all three indexes have gained on average between 1 and 2 percent, respectively.

If history is an indication, the stock market could extend its rally into December.
U.S. stocks finished the shortened-holiday week with another gain, up for eight consecutive weeks. The S&P 500 set its longest winning streak in nearly 10 years, while it was the Dow's longest consecutive weekly increase in three years. Both indexes are up 6.8 percent and 6.7 percent, respectively, in that period.
During Friday's trading session, the S&P 500, Dow industrials, Dow transportsand Russell 2000 set new all-time intraday highs, while the Nasdaq hit a fresh 13-year intraday high.
Since the 1900s, December is the best month for the Dow, and second-best month for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq. Historically, all three indexes have gained on average between 1 and 2 percent, respectively.
The trend holds in recent times as well. In the past 20 years, the S&P finished positive in December 80 percent of the time, while the Dow industrials rose 75 percent of the time, and 55 percent for the Nasdaq. The real outlier, however, has been the Russell 2000 index, which posted a gain 85 percent of the time, up on average 3.36 percent.
Small-caps outperformed large caps by a large margin in 2013, rising 35 percent compared with an increase of 27 percent for the S&P. It's shaping out to be the best year for the Russell since 2003, and the best for the S&P since 1998.

DECEMBER SEASONALITY
YearDowS&PNASRussellS&P MidDJ Trans.
20120.60.710.313.342.033.67
20111.430.85-0.580.47-0.521.49
20105.196.536.197.796.415.17
20090.81.785.817.886.124.11
2008-0.60.782.75.564.610.71
2007-0.8-0.86-0.33-0.23-0.3-1.95
20061.971.26-0.680.2-0.6-3.54
2005-0.82-0.1-1.23-0.60.62
20043.43.253.752.814.093.81
20036.865.082.21.91.592.94
2002-6.23-6.03-9.69-5.73-4.2-2.15
20011.730.761.036.025.085.1
20003.580.41-4.98.437.577.1
19995.695.7821.9811.165.852.32
19980.715.6412.476.0911.983.9
19971.091.57-1.891.653.771.77
1996-1.13-2.15-0.122.4-0.01-1.53
19950.841.74-0.672.39-0.39-4.31
19942.551.230.222.50.750.81
19931.91.012.973.274.480.29
Average:1.441.461.983.362.941.58
% Positive:75%80%55%85%70%75%

Friday, November 29, 2013

You really can time the stock market A few key statistics can help average-Joe investors buy low, sell high

Today both the Shiller PE and the q show the market well above long-term averages. The Shiller PE is about 25 and the q is 0.96. This suggests that investors should be exercising a sharp degree of caution. The corollary of this idea is that these things can take years to play out. The market can go up a long way before it comes back down—if it does. 





Timing “is a wicked idea — don’t try it, ever,” wrote Charles Ellis, one of the leading lights of indexing, many years ago.
According to conventional wisdom, any attempt to time the market is fundamentally flawed. Stock markets follow a ‘random walk’, they say. No one can predict the market’s next move, so trying to do so will end up costing you money. A lot of your long-term gains will come from a few big “up” days, and these are completely unpredictable — if you are out of the market when they happen you will miss out on a lot of profits.
Money managers often push this idea to the clients. It has, from their point of view, a side benefit: It helps keeps the clients fully invested at all times, which means their assets are generating more fees.
But is the idea correct?
The simple answer: No.
Yes, most people who try to time the market end up screwing it up — they buy and sell at the wrong times — but that does not mean the idea is flawed.
On the contrary, historically, “smart” timing, based on market fundamentals, has been one of the soundest ways to beat the market and produce above-average investment returns over the long term.
What is smart timing? Simple: It is long-term timing, and it is based on following a few solid valuation metrics.
It is not about trying to trade short-term. It is not about selling stocks on Wednesday and planning to buy them back on the following Monday. It is not about obscure market technicals like “head and shoulders” formations or Bollinger bands.
It is about cutting your exposure to stocks when the market is expensive in relation to fundamentals, and keeping your exposure down—if need be, for years—until the market becomes much cheaper. It then involves increasing your exposure, and keeping it high, again for years if necessary.

The myth of ‘random’ returns

Techniques available to anyone have worked, and worked well, for over a century. That does not mean they will work in the future, but it is a strong argument in their favor.
First, let’s demolish the myth that the stock market produces entirely “random” returns—that some years it’s up, other years it’s down, that over time it just goes up, and no one can predict anything in advance.

Search The Web