Saturday, March 13, 2010

Kevin O'Leary: Canada's unrepentant Dragon O'Leary is breathing fire (and building his personal brand) on CBC TV's business reality show Dragons' Den


Kevin O'Leary, mean dragon, is nursing his first glass of Antinori Tignanello 2006 within the comforting confines of a striving Yorkville restaurant.

The "Ting," as O'Leary calls the Tuscan vino, is 56 bucks a glass. "Nectar from the nipple of Aphrodite," he says approvingly, which sounds like a bit of shtick, a practised line, to complement the cultivated persona of Kevin O'Leary, whose raison d'etre appears to be the non-stop development of the Kevin O'Leary brand.

"It's not a shtick," O'Leary says of his public self, identifiable by his caustic, sometimes belligerent, determinedly high-profile fire-breathing performance on CBC TV's hit reality show Dragons' Den. Also by his appearance each weeknight on the Lang & O'Leary Exchange, through which he gets to bat about his unbending economic/political views with Amanda Lang.

"The CBC was a platform for journalists," O'Leary says. "Now it's a platform for a right-wing Attila the Hun guy." He's referring to himself. "There's only one side with me. You get the right side. You get the correct version of the facts."

What you see is what you get.

O'Leary is explaining himself, sliding under the microscope in advance of a special Dragons' Den episode March 17 which ever so gently explores the back story of each of the five dragons who sit in judgment of always eager, sometimes anxious and occasionally weepy entrepreneurs driven to dig into the dragons' pockets in order to further their entrepreneurial dreams.

Recall Stacey Kelley and her six-foot-high pet tethering device, which allows cats to securely roam and, bonus, escape up the pole to a small platform when a nasty neighbourhood dog approaches. "Why bother with a pole?" was O'Leary's curt query. "Put the cat outside. If it's not around in the evening, get a new one." (The device, by the way, can be viewed on Kelly's website, www.ihatekevinoleary.com.)

Kevin O'Leary tough guy. "I'm not a tough guy," is his response to the obvious characterization. "I'm just delivering the truth and only the truth and if you can't deal with it, too bad. Next. You're not an entrepreneur. You're a loser."

O'Leary is a winner, which is how he gets to be a dragon, though how much of a winner he is in financial terms is a mystery. "I think it adds to the mystique," he says of his refusal to quantify his net worth.

Certainly the O'Leary aura is burnished on next week's Dragons' Den episode in which he revisits the site of an Ottawa ice cream parlour where, as a young man, he was ordered to get down on his knees and scrape gum off the shop floor as part of his ice cream scooping job.

O'Leary refused and was abruptly fired. "I have never, ever in my life worked for someone again," he tells the camera before tearing up and dabbing his eyes softly with a tissue. "I can't believe I'm so emotional. S–t."

That I-will-always-be-my-own-man epiphany is book-ended by Softkey International Inc., a software company O'Leary co-founded in the basement of a midtown Toronto house with $10,000 in seed capital from his mother. The short story is that Softkey was transformed into the Learning Co. Inc. (LCI), making its mark as a seller of such educational software as Reader Rabbit.

LCI secured a listing on the New York Stock Exchange – an exchange that requires real assets prior to listing, O'Leary feels compelled to note. The listing provided the leverage to go on an acquisition binge, gobbling up the likes of Broderbund Software, which brought with it the monster gaming title, Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego? ("Ate 'em alive," is O'Leary's snappy description of the Broderbund takeover.)

What made Kevin O'Leary rich was the moment he calls the "massive liquidity event," that is the sale of LCI to toymaker Mattel Inc. for $4.2 billion (U.S.). O'Leary wasn't the company's largest shareholder, not by a long shot.

According to 1998 securities filings, Thomas H. Lee Partners, a Boston-based private equity firm, held nine million shares. The Tribune Co. was next up with five million. Bain Capital had 3.4 million. O'Leary, the company's president, had just over a million shares. O'Leary says he had more than that.

Within months of the deal, announced in December 1998, Mattel issued warnings of unexpected losses at LCI. In late October, 1999, the toymaker announced that the Learning Company division incurred an after-tax loss of about $105 million in the third quarter as opposed to what had been a projected profit of $50 million.

As much as O'Leary proclaimed that he would never work for anyone again after the gum-on-the-floor debacle, he was, at the time of the disastrous Mattel numbers, an employee of that company. As part of the merger, O'Leary signed a three-year employment agreement that included a base salary of $650,000, 1.7 million stock options to be converted to Mattel shares and a reporting line to Jill Barad, the first woman to ascend to the CEO's chair at Barbie Inc. O'Leary calls Barad "the best marketer I ever met."

O'Leary didn't make the three years. In November, a month after the earnings release, he was fired. "She just whacked me," O'Leary says of Barad, who followed O'Leary out the door three months later.

O'Leary, who blames the serial bad corporate news on a host of factors, including the pending tech meltdown of spring, 2000, received the maximum severance payment of $5.25 million. He says he didn't bother returning to his office on firing day. He packed no boxes. He headed to the Caribbean island of St. Bart's instead. To think.

Here's a thought: "Being an employee is a bad outcome," opines O'Leary. "You want to avoid that. Being an employee is never a good outcome. That's just an opinion."

It's an opinion that jibes nicely with Dragons' Den, a show whose very essence is to promote the entrepreneurial spirit. The hopeful ones pitch their business concepts to the five dragons and seek a fixed sum of money in exchange, commonly, for a piece of the business.

In the dragon lineup, the CBC casts O'Leary as the "ruthless" one with a knack for one-liners. "You can't cry your way to success," is catchy. "I'm the merchant of truth," is heard a lot. "You can't regulate a soul into a business," is O'Leary's rejoinder to the corporate social responsibility movement. "I'm not trying to make friends, I'm just trying to make money," speaks for itself.

In this way O'Leary plays against Brett Wilson, the dragon who made his fortune financing oil and gas deals and Arlene Dickinson, a marketing guru. Both Wilson and Dickinson evince a soft spot for, or at least an interest in, the people behind the pitches. For O'Leary it's about the money.

On that point, there appear to be few deals that O'Leary actually likes. "What can I say? Kevin is tight with his wallet," says Tracie Tighe, the show's executive producer. "But he's come through every year and has closed a deal or two. This year he did the Dig It ladies."

The Dig It ladies are Wendy Johannson and Claudia Harvey, based in Etobicoke and creators of a company that sells, among other items, gardening gloves specially designed with pillow-topped nail protectors to preserve expensive manicures. In November, Dragons' Den aired the episode in which the ladies sought $50,000 for a 10-per-cent stake in their company. The episode was actually shot in May, during one of the marathon filming sessions the dragons are subjected to.

O'Leary liked the gloves and was willing to invest, with one whomping condition; he wanted a 3 per cent royalty payment on sales of the gardening gloves in perpetuity. The ladies said yes, causing Wilson to rebuke O'Leary thusly: "You are a crook," a sentiment echoed by Dickinson with the less pejorative, "You suck."

The Dig It ladies were not born yesterday. "I knew that what you shake on on the show doesn't really mean anything," says Johannson. "I had done my research about what the closing rate is and what the due diligence process is after the fact." (Tighe says the six handshake deals in season one resulted in a single deal closing. Of the approximately 40 deals struck this year, 10 have survived the due diligence process.)

Johannson says she fully expected O'Leary to drop the royalty demand once he became informed of the full range of Dig It product, including Eye Dig It safety sunglasses. In the end, O'Leary did let the royalty go in exchange for 10 per cent of the whole company rather than the one gardening glove. The size of the deal? Fifty grand.

Meanwhile, O'Leary featured Dig It, ladies in tow, on the Lang & O'Leary Exchange the night after the Dragons' Den airing. At heart, O'Leary is a marketer, in this instance downgrading what is supposed to be a high-octane business show to the shilling of gardening wear.

"What we can tell you is when we say to people Kevin O'Leary is our business partner, their ears perk up and they're much more likely to come on board as one of our retailers or business partners," Johannson says.

The Dig It gardening gloves are now in approximately 120 retailers across the country, a fourfold increase from just before the televised exposure. Johannson says a prominent retail chain is close to an agreement to carry the product nationally.

Who's the smartie? As it happens, that 50 grand was extended in the form of a line of credit. On that line of credit Johannson and Harvey have drawn not a single penny. Question for Johannson: "So it's conceivable that O'Leary won't have to pay anything for that 10 per cent?" Johannson: "Correct."

Of the myriad deals he has not touched O'Leary has no regrets. "Once I pass on them, they're dead to me," he says.

You sense that it really doesn't matter. What does matter is the televised exposure of Kevin O'Leary. He's unquestionably pleased and somewhat surprised by the brand-building power of TV. It'll come in handy. Two years ago, O'Leary launched the O'Leary Funds, which today has 10 investment funds, run out of Toronto.

O'Leary is chairman – he does not manage the funds himself. Assets under administration: $860 million. The company's branding line: "Get paid while you wait." Investment philosophy: never buy a security that doesn't have yield. (O'Leary's mother had one hard rule about money: never touch the principal.) End game: take it public. Target market: you.

"I have a very simple objective in life," says O'Leary, relaxing now into his second glass of Tignanello. "I want to go to bed richer than when I woke up. It's that simple"

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Pescod Talks Stock

HARD CREEK NICKEL
When we first met Mark Jarvis years ago…heck, almost
a decade now, he was part of a band of adventurists behind
Ultra Petroleum that had latched onto a new concept—
unconventional gas—and somehow this bunch from Van-
couver had tied up an absolutely enormous chunk of land
in Wyoming.
The story had several ups and downs, but Jarvis (a di-
rector with the company) and the driving force, particularly
for many of the IR tours, was part of one of the most spec-
tacular stock plays in the history of the markets. Ultra went
from virtually nothing to $130 a share...the kind of stuff you
dream of!
Jarvis’s dream might have been to sit on a bench and
write scripts and write the ‘Great Canadian Novel’ but once
you’ve been part of something enormous, I guess there’s
that thing that makes you want to do it again.
He’s faced a lot of hard work and frustrations as he
spent the last four years with Hard Creek Nickel and just this
week received their engineering report. It’s a massive, $3
billion project in Northern B.C. and it looks like Jarvis has
quite a selling job ahead of himself here.
We ask Jarvis to write a few paragraphs describing what
next:
“This engineering report is the culmination of two years
of detailed metallurgical and process engineering work.
Because our deposit is unconventional, we have to prove
every step of the processing in order to be credible to in-
dustry. We have done that and we are ready to be sub-
jected to detailed due diligence from prospective partners.”
Mark writes “Our operating costs, at U.S. $3.34 per
pound of nickel (net by-product credits), are very competi-
tive, particularly compared to other giant greenfields de-
posits. (Giant is defined as capable of producing more than
20,000 tonnes of nickel per year.) Our average output will
be 35,000 tonnes of nickel metal per year, or 77 million
pounds.”
He continues “Capex, at $3 billion, is high, but it in-
cludes a refinery so we can produce nickel metal. This is a
gigantic project and we are looking for a gigantic partner.
The search for a partner begins today. Without naming
names, I can tell you that a long list of companies have
been waiting to see this engineering report.”
“Let the games begin. Gentlemen, start your engines.”
Yes this is another project that is absolutely enormous,
you read it right folks ($3 billion dollars) and Jarvis would
have one heck of a sales job to see if he could sell the com-
pany here.

EAST ASIA MINERALS
(V-EAS)
GOLD
MINERA ANDES
(V-MAI)
It’s PDAC! The world’s biggest mining conference
over the last couple of days in Toronto and it was
packed. Estimates were somewhere around 25,000 and
we weren’t there, but veteran mining speculator/
investor Scott Wellington was.
We had asked him to check out a couple of stories
for us and he compares the immense crowds and hy-
per-activity this year with six years ago. At that time
there was a lull in the mining market and he said the
convention was basically deserted.
He had taken his 14-year-old daughter Samantha at
the time to tour it and see what the mining show was
like. So many people in the booths had nothing to do,
Samantha had a couple of very intriguing experi-
ences...they happened to be going by one of the dia-
mond companies and some people there obviously had
too little to do...so they took out a bag of diamonds, a
million and a half worth to show her what they look
like.
Later they went to the Placer Dome booth where
once again the guys had nothing to do. “Here you go
Samantha, here’s a 500-ounce gold bar for you play
with.” Scott didn’t tell us if that turned her into a ge-
ologist or not, but as we said, we asked him to check
out some stories for us…and one in particular, East
Asia. He writes the following:
“Investors forget that East Asia is more than just the
Miwah gold deposits. Their Barisan porphyries have
strong potential to be world class structures. Rio Tinto
was actively exploring several targets in the '90's with
strong results until the government stopped work in
'98. East Asia will drill 2-3 holes in both Lower Tengker-
eng and Bahu by mid-year. LT has a previous drill re-
sult returning 339m of .47g Au & .2 Cu and the com-
pany feels there's a strong probability for substantial
improvement in grade and width. Bahu has not previ-
ously been drilled but surface work shows a large
structure with encouraging grade.”
“The Abong gold deposit has been overshadowed
by Miwah but most juniors would love to have such a
problem. 130 holes have been drilled showing a flat
near surface 10-15m thick deposit of about 1g Au with
higher grade pockets (4-6g) open in both directions
and a 43-101 due sometime mid year. These proper-
ties along with their other Indonesian properties are
being forgotten in the Miwah shadow.”

“At Miwah, the company continues to show
the deposit trends north into the Moon River area where
surface work has the same rock type as Miwah.
We hope to be running either Friday or Monday, an
interview with the Coffin’s of the Hard Rock Analyst fame
again and we suspect East Asia Minerals is going to con-
tinue to attract an awful lot of attention.
UNDERWORLD RES.
ATAC RESOURCES
KAMINAK GOLD
Yesterday, we did a piece on Underworld Resources
with a picture of an incredibly handsome young guy
sitting in a sluice box with a gold pan full of gold...of
course it was yours truly.
The season is starting up in the Yukon and boy did it
start with a bang today as Underworld Resources ended
being bought out by Kinross on a friendly arrangement
between the two companies.
Obviously today, the world is suddenly aware of the
Yukon and for someone who had lived up in the Yukon
for several years, it’s nice to see the attention going
back where it belongs.
Once again, it’s hard to believe that a 100 years after
the original gold prospectors were up there from the
Trail of 1898, it looks like it’s going to be a very busy
season up north.
Now that Underworld is gone, the two companies
that seem to be getting most of the chatter are Kaminak
Gold and Atac Resources.
One look at the volumes today on the associated
companies and it tells you the interest will be there for
the Yukon this year and with the takeover Underworld
does almost 19 million shares trading.
Meanwhile, Kaminak does 1.3 million and is up
nicely. And Atac also does 1.6 million—also up nicely.


Search The Web